Notes on Theorists

Jumping into this elective with no background in applied linguistics (and an outdated background in education) has been difficult in the sense that I don't know much about the key theorists. I'm using this space to jot down the names of various theorists we've covered in this class, the years they published said theories, and a bit about their theories and ideas.

Cameron (2001) – There may be a tendency to patronize young learners by only teaching them numbers and colors, but young learners are capable of following their genuine interests in a foreign language and this also helps them see the value in learning a FL. A holistic way to teach is through stories.

Prensky (2001) – using digital technology changes brain structure J
Carr (2011) – using digital technology changes brain structure L

Kress (2010) and Jewitt (2009) – 21st century literacy is multimodal and includes images, video, text, and sounds
Gee (2011) – disagrees and uses literacy to mean text-based only

Buckingham (2007) – digital literacy requires students to be able to create as well as consume digital media (Walker and White agree)

Pinter (2011) – the “critical period” of language acquisition is only true for pronunciation skills

Gee (2005) – “affinity spaces” physical or virtual places in which people develop relationships and discourse communities based on shared interests – social networking, for example (almost a community of practice, but not quite

Gee (2007) – benefits of video games for learning, reading and deciphering texts which might otherwise be above their reading level

Lightbrown and Spada (2006) – “natural language settings” aka immersion, focus is on communication rather than accuracy

Papert (1993) – using Mathland of Logo to learn math through communication

Bruner (1978) – “communicative ratchet” – the way parents scaffold language for infants

Lave and Wenger (1991) – “communities of practice”

Warschauer and Kern (2000) – Computer Assisted Language Learning developed in 3 phases, which aligned with dominant paradigms of language learning and technology: 1) structural, 2) communicative, 3) integrative

Bax (2003) – alternative model to Warschauer, has “approaches to CALL” rather than phases (less linear than Warschauer’s): 1) restricted CALL, 2) open CALL, 3) integrated CALL (will be achieved when the technology is fully normalized

Taylor (1980) – Computer can play the role of Tutor, Tutee, or Tool

Papert (1993) – learning experience is strongest when learners are involved in making – creating a product or teaching/explaining to others. He proposed Logo/Mathland to help kids learn math like a language.

Socio-Cultural Theories: Learning occurs more effectively when people are working together

Vygotsky (1978) – social-constructivism, learning is constructed first through social interaction and then on the individual plane. Learning takes place through the zone of proximal development (ZPD) – the gap between what a learner already knows and what a learner can achieve when working with a more able peer.

Krashen (1997) – “i + 1” Learners need to receive input at a slightly higher level than they can produce it

Bruner (1978) – “communicative ratchet” The way a parent rephrases the child’s words in a way that models more complex language (and thus supports child’s linguistic development)

Siemens (2005) – “connectivism” Learning occurs through engaging with a diversity of ideas and opinions, and that knowledge may come from digital sources



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WTF is applied linguistics, anyway?

Image
“You’re a linguist? How many languages do you speak?” “You want to study linguistics? I’m embarrassed to write a letter of recommendation for your application; my grammar is horrible.” When I shared with my friends and co-workers that I wanted to get my Master’s Degree in Applied Linguistics, those are some of the comments I heard. They illustrate a couple of the misconceptions about this field. Linguists study language; they are not necessarily polyglots . Some learn several languages just for the love of it, but it is not at all a requirement. And along the same vein, linguists study language; they don’t prescribe it . We study how a language functions and how people use language, but very few linguists try to tell people how they should use language. Take the title of this post, for example. There are linguists who study how textspeak (things like “WTF” and “LOL”) has become a part of our spoken language. “WTF” in particular cracks me up (makes me LOL, if you will) beca...
Read more

What do you bring to the table?

Image
What Do You Bring to the Table? or, A Cheesy Extended Metaphor (that, while cheesy, is still helping me to envision and articulate my goals) “What do you bring to the table?” is an idiomatic expression in English meaning “What do you provide that will be beneficial to this group?” It is often used in a business setting or an interview scenario to determine a newcomer’s potential role in the office. I don’t know its origins, but I like to think of the expression as coming from a potluck dinner party. What will you bring to the table? I’ll bring plates and napkins. I’ll bring a side dish. I’ll bring dessert. Maybe some people also show up with flowers or a bottle of wine. Ideally, every guest brings something that contributes to the overall enjoyment of the meal. This week, as my classmates and I have discussed the definition of applied linguistics and the concept of “funds of knowledge”, the phrase “bring to the table” keeps entering my head, and I’ve been exploring the ex...
Read more

An Academic Adventure

I've wanted to attend graduate school for many years now, and the stars finally aligned. I found an online program that I can do from home at my own pace (anywhere from 2 - 5 years) in a subject that I enjoy AND will have practical applications. And I have the time and resources and mental energy to do this now. So I applied and was accepted to University of Massachusetts Boston for a Master's Degree in Applied Linguistics with a concentration in Foreign Language Pedagogy. I'm not sure exactly what I'll do when I'm finished, but it will open up some possibilities for me. And if I go back to the same thing I was doing before having kids (teaching high school German), I will go into it with more education and training. My first course is coming to an end in a few weeks. It's been a great one to start with. It's all about technology in the language classroom. The professor suggested we keep a blog with our notes because it will come in handy when studying f...
Read more